Obama et Hollande : l’islam n’a rien à voir avec l’islam

post_thumb_default

 

Dire que l'État islamique ne parle d'aucune religion ou que l'ennemi numéro un de l'islam, c'est l'État islamique, c'est comme affirmer que le catholicisme n'a rien à voir avec la chrétienté. C'est absurde. C'est une pantalonnade. Et c'est une traîtrise.

 

Extrait de: Source et auteur

Suisse shared items on The Old Reader (RSS)

2 commentaires

  1. Posté par Aude le

    De Boubama….pas étonnant, il est musulman. La sauce hollandaise nage dans la choucroute…A croire décidément qu’il n’y connaît rien en politique étrangère qui plus est, ignore tout ou presque tout de l’Islam. Il veut combattre El Assad..en aidant les islamistes. Mais encore, il veut combattre les islamistes composant l’Etat islamiste..Fait génuflexion..devant le Qatar lequel finance les terroristes.
    Plus dingue…tu meurs.
    Que va-t-il bien faire lorsque les fous d’Allah auront envahi l’Algérie et débarqueront à Marseille? Leur demander un tapis de prière et se mettre le cul en l’air?

  2. Posté par Leb le

    (1 de 10) Islam – Ce que l’ouest doit savoir (French Version) .https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI9Jlkobhhg&list=PLCF7AB0C442AD4775&index=1
    et aussi:
    Is Islam a Peaceful Religion? Who Are They Peaceful With?
    Do they chop off hands and heads? What about killing infidels and honor killing? Killing less radical Muslims? Tribal and family belligerence? Women abused and subjugated?
    By Real News
    Is Islam a peaceful religion? Is it a violent one? Does the Quran teach violence? Does it teach love and peace? Are all Muslims violent? Are some of them violent while a majority of them just want to live peaceful lives? Do most Muslim tribes and families fight among themselves?
    In a nutshell, what kind of society have Muslims created in places where they had the power to create the kind of societies that they wanted to create?
    Now compare those societies with the societies created by Christian majority states, like those of the Western Europe or in the US. Or the society created by the Hindu majority state of India.
    There, you’ve answered the question that « Is Islam a peaceful religion today? » The real violence committed in the name of Islam was not committed when those planes hit the twin towers, not even when those bombs went off in the streets of London or in the trains of Mumbai.
    The real violence in the name of Islam is committed every single day in those Muslim majority countries like Saudi Arabia where you cannot freely practice any other religion, cannot have a free civic discourse and cannot have basic human rights. That is the real Islamic terrorism, Islamo-fascism or whatever other term that you fancy. The people ramming those planes into the twin towers were only the end result of that terrorism.
    Don’t you feel safer now that President Barack Obama and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano hired and gave top security clearance to several devout Muslims?
    Islamization of a society begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for discriminatory religious privileges. When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other manifestations tend to infiltrate, eroding and contaminating the culture.
    Here’s how history validated the progression in the year 2008:
    As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
    United States — Muslim 0.6%
    Australia — Muslim 1.5%
    Canada — Muslim 1.9%
    China — Muslim 1.8%
    Italy — Muslim 1.5%
    Norway — Muslim 1.8%
    At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize among other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:
    Denmark — Muslim 2%
    Germany — Muslim 3.7%
    United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
    Spain — Muslim 4%
    Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
    From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply.
    At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
    This is occurring in:
    France — Muslim 8%
    Philippines — Muslim 5%
    Sweden — Muslim 5%
    Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
    The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
    Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
    When Moslems approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
    Guyana — Muslim 10%
    India — Muslim 13.4%
    Israel — Muslim 16%
    Kenya — Muslim 10%
    Russia — Muslim 15%
    After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
    Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
    At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
    Bosnia — Muslim 40%
    Chad — Muslim 53.1%
    Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
    From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing genocide), use of Sharia law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
    Albania — Muslim 70%
    Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
    Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
    Sudan — Muslim 70%
    After 80%, there is daily intimidation and violent jihad, some state-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Islam. This has been experienced and is on-going in:
    Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
    Egypt — Muslim 90%
    Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
    Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
    Iran — Muslim 98%
    Iraq — Muslim 97%
    Jordan — Muslim 92%
    Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
    Pakistan — Muslim 97%
    Palestine — Muslim 99%
    Syria — Muslim 90%
    Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
    Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
    United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
    100% supposedly ushers in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. There is supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the madrasses are the only schools, and the Quran is the only word, such as in:
    Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
    Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
    Somalia — Muslim 100%
    Yemen — Muslim 100%
    Unfortunately, peace is never achieved! As in the 100% states above, the most radical Muslims intimidate, spew hatred, violate women and children, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, using rationalizations and corruptions of every basic human decency »

Et vous, qu'en pensez vous ?

Poster un commentaire

Votre commentaire est susceptible d'être modéré, nous vous prions d'être patients.

* Ces champs sont obligatoires

Avertissement! Seuls les commentaires signés par leurs auteurs sont admis, sauf exceptions demandées auprès des Observateurs.ch pour des raisons personnelles ou professionnelles. Les commentaires sont en principe modérés. Toutefois, étant donné le nombre très considérable et en progression fulgurante des commentaires (259'163 commentaires retenus et 79'280 articles publiés, chiffres au 1 décembre 2020), un travail de modération complet et exhaustif est totalement impensable. Notre site invite, par conséquent, les commentateurs à ne pas transgresser les règles élémentaires en vigueur et à se conformer à la loi afin d’éviter tout recours en justice. Le site n’est pas responsable de propos condamnables par la loi et fournira, en cas de demande et dans la mesure du possible, les éléments nécessaires à l’identification des auteurs faisant l’objet d’une procédure judiciaire. Les commentaires n’engagent que leurs auteurs. Le site se réserve, par ailleurs, le droit de supprimer tout commentaire qu’il repérerait comme anonyme et invite plus généralement les commentateurs à s’en tenir à des propos acceptables et non condamnables.

Entrez les deux mots ci-dessous (séparés par un espace). Si vous n'arrivez pas à lire les mots vous pouvez afficher une nouvelle image.